1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 783 F.Supp.
  5. 783 F.Supp. 830 (1992)
 

FARKAS v. ELLIS

No. 91 Civ. 182 (WCC).

783 F.Supp. 830 (1992)

Thomas FARKAS, Michael Mak, Peter Mak, Thomas Medora, John Querim, Rafael Rosado and John Toma, Plaintiffs, v. William ELLIS, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Farkas, pro se.

Michael Mak, pro se.

Peter Mak, pro se.

Thomas Medora, pro se.

John Querim, pro se.

Rafael Rosado, pro se.

John Toma, pro se.

Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, P.A. (Jedd Mendelson, of counsel), Roseland, N.J., for The New York Times.

William S. Ellis, pro se.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

In an Opinion and Order dated January 10, 1992, 780 F.Supp. 1013, this Court denied pro se plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., and dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Familiarity with that opinion is presumed. This matter is presently before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases