HONEYWELL, INC. v. U.S.

No. 91-3455.

973 F.2d 638 (1992)

HONEYWELL, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Carroll, Minneapolis, Minn., argued (James F. Carroll and Myron L. Frans, on the brief), for appellant.

Bridget M. Rowan, Washington, D.C., argued (James A. Bruton, Gary R. Allen, Ann B. Durney and Bridget M. Rowan, on the brief), for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and ROY, Senior District Judge.


ROY, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff/appellant in this action, Honeywell, Inc. ("Honeywell"), sought to amend its 1979 income tax return in March of 1987 by claiming additional tax credits under the Work Incentive Training ("WIN") program. The Internal Revenue Service denied the claim, resulting in Honeywell bringing suit in the District Court for the District of Minnesota. Following the submission of cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases