1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 839 P.2d
  5. 839 P.2d 763 (1992)
 

STATE v. STOLZ

DCR89-15240; CA A71712.

839 P.2d 763 (1992)

115 Or. App. 702

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Gary Richard STOLZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Wolf, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

Teresa McPhee, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

DURHAM, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after trial to the court, for resisting arrest. ORS 162.315. He asserts that the court failed to inquire sufficiently before it allowed him to waive his right to counsel. We affirm.

In State v. Meyrick, 313 Or. 125, 831 P.2d 666 (1992), the court held that, to determine whether a defendant's right to counsel under Article I, section 11...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases