1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 839 P.2d
  5. 839 P.2d 760 (1992)
 

MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF HOGUE

C88-0813-ST; CA A71349.

839 P.2d 760 (1992)

115 Or. App. 697

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Karen Jo HOGUE, Respondent, and James S. Hogue, Appellant. STATE of Oregon, ex rel. Karen Jo HOGUE, Respondent, v. James S. HOGUE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven K. Chappell, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Hendrix & Chappell, Bend.

Gary E. Rueppell, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hampson, Bayless, Murphy & Stiner, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

DURHAM, Judge.

Father appeals from the trial court's orders denying his motion to decrease his monthly child support obligation, holding him in contempt for failing to comply with the terms of the dissolution judgment and awarding attorney fees to mother. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we vacate the award of attorney fees and otherwise affirm.

Father's support obligation for the parties' only child, Lucas, is $400 per month.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases