1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 805 F.Supp.
  5. 805 F.Supp. 792 (1992)
 

MATEO v. M/S KISO

No. C-90-2357 DLJ.

805 F.Supp. 792 (1992)

Diosdodo Z. MATEO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The M/S KISO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Stender, Esq., of McTernan, Stender & Walsh, San Francisco, Cal., and Richard Dodson, Sole Practitioner, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs.

Frederick W. Wentker, Jr., and Phillip Dalton, of Lillick & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

ORDER

JENSEN, District Judge.

There are three motions before the Court. First, several defendants have filed a motion to quash service of process. Second, other defendants have filed a motion for summary adjudication of the issue of whether certain elements of plaintiffs' benefit package constitute "wages" under 46 U.S.C. § 10313. Third, plaintiffs have filed a motion to certify an interlocutory appeal. A hearing was held on the first two motions on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases