SEARCY v. AUERBACH

No. 91-16289.

980 F.2d 609 (1992)

Sandra SEARCY; Conner Searcy, by and through his guardian ad litem Sandra Searcy; and Stacy Searcy, by and through her guardian ad litem Sandra Searcy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Roy R. AUERBACH, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Towner, Towner & Lippe, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gregory E. Ebstein, Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Brown, Kilduff & Day, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before: BOOCHEVER, NOONAN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Sandra Searcy and her children Conner and Stacy (the Searcys) brought a suit against Roy R. Auerbach for intentional infliction of emotional distress, libel, professional negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The Searcys were residents of Texas, Auerbach of California, so diversity of citizenship existed. The district court gave summary judgment for Auerbach. We reverse and remand for trial.

BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases