PLUMLEE v. PADDOCK

No. 2-91-238-CV.

832 S.W.2d 757 (1992)

Joe PLUMLEE, Appellant, v. Michael PADDOCK, Individually Jim Loveless, Individually Charles Roach, Individually and the Partnership of Paddock, Loveless & Roach, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled August 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel W. Westbrook, San Antonio (Edward J. Schroeder, of counsel), for appellant.

Joe Shannon, Jr., Fort Worth, for appellees.

Before WEAVER, C.J., and FARRIS and MEYERS, JJ.


OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Joe Plumlee appeals a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of Michael Paddock, Jim Loveless, Charles Roach and the partnership of Paddock, Loveless and Roach. Plumlee raises one point of error contending the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on his alleged referral contract with appellees. We overrule Plumlee's sole point and affirm because the alleged contract, if one exists, was illegal and void against public policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases