1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 964 F.2d
  5. 964 F.2d 600 (1992)
 

HAMILTON v. KOMATSU DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 91-2472.

964 F.2d 600 (1992)

James HAMILTON, Gerald Crank, Anthony Russell, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KOMATSU DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, a Joint Venture, and Dresser Industries, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Wayne Harvey, Harvey & Stuckel, Peoria, Ill. (argued), for plaintiffs-appellants James Hamilton and Gerald Crank.

R. Wayne Harvey, Floyd C. Dailey, Harvey & Stuckel, Peoria, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants Anthony Russell and Russell Carrell.

Roy G. Davis, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Peoria, Ill. (argued), for defendants-appellees.

Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, present and former employees of Komatsu Dresser Company and Dresser Industries, Inc. ("Dresser"), filed suit alleging, inter alia, that Dresser violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Dresser finding that the plaintiffs failed to timely file discrimination charges with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases