1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 614 A.2d
  5. 614 A.2d 943 (1992)
 

LE CHIC TAXICAB v. D.C. TAXICAB COM'N

No. 91-AA-1172.

614 A.2d 943 (1992)

LE CHIC TAXICAB COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reginald F. Martin, III, for petitioner.

Rosalyn Calbert Groce, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom John Payton, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the Memorandum in Lieu of Brief, for respondent.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, FARRELL, Associate Judge, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner contends that the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission failed to follow the procedures prescribed by its regulations in considering the exceptions which petitioner noted to a proposed decision of a hearing examiner imposing two civil fines for taxicab infractions specified in 31 DCMR § 825.1 (1990). We conclude that while the process by which the Commission rendered its decision may have been defective, that defect provides no basis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases