1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 600 N.E.2d
  5. 600 N.E.2d 955 (1992)
 

STUCKER FORK CONSERVANCY v. UTIL. COM'N

No. 93A02-9108-EX-370.

600 N.E.2d 955 (1992)

STUCKER FORK CONSERVANCY District, Appellant-Petitioner, v. INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND UTILITY CONSUMER COUNSELOR, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

October 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Cregor, Douglas E. Cregor, Cregor & Lalley, Indianapolis, Spencer J. Schnaitter, Madison, for appellant-petitioner.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Kirk A. Knoll, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant Stucker Fork Conservancy District (Stucker) appeals the Order of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (Commission), approved July 31, 1991, which assessed Stucker the Public Utility Annual Fee.1 We restate the issue formulated at the pre-appeal conference as follows: Whether the assessment against Stucker must be the fee attributable to a municipal utility?

We affirm.

The Stucker Fork Conservancy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases