VOGEL v. CITY OF CINCINNATI

No. 91-3474.

959 F.2d 594 (1992)

Richard VOGEL, Appellant, v. The CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Appellees, the Sentinel Police Association, Intervenor-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Wyler (argued), Donald B. Hordes, Donna M. Bergmann, and Schwartz, Manes & Ruby (briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant Vogel.

Mark C. Vollman (argued), Fay D. Dupuis, City Solicitor, Julie F. Bissinger, Assistant City Solicitor, and Richard H. Castellini, City Solicitor's Office for the City of Cincinnati (briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees City of Cincinnati, Ohio, et al.

Alphonse A. Gerhardstein (argued) and Laufman, Rauh & Gerhardstein (briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for intervenor-appellee Sentinel Police Association.

Before: KEITH, RYAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.


TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Richard Vogel appeals from a summary judgment entered April 16, 1991, in the Southern District of Ohio, Carl B. Rubin, District Judge, in favor of appellees City of Cincinnati, et al., in an action commenced by Vogel to obtain damages resulting from the Cincinnati Police Division's affirmative action hiring policy.

The City adopted the affirmative hiring policy pursuant to a consent decree entered August 13, 1981. This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases