BESS v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT

Docket No. A052111.

3 Cal.App.4th 1544 (1992)

5 Cal. Rptr.2d 399

THOMAS L. BESS et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mathews & Kluck, Francis B. Mathew and Thomas B. Mathews for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Robert G. Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

STEIN, J.

The instant action involves the rights of the public (1) to use the Van Duzen River as it flows through property owned by Thomas L. and Carol Bess (the Besses), and (2) to obtain access to the river across the Besses' property. The trial court found that the Van Duzen River is navigable and thus that "the State owns in fee simple,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases