IN MATTER OF BURRIS v. SAIF CORPORATION

90-07378; CA A71218.

841 P.2d 696 (1992)

116 Or. App. 498

In the Matter of the Compensation of James L. Burris, Claimant. James L. BURRIS, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Photocraft, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 18, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied January 27, 1993.

Review Denied February 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cynthia Cumfer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Michael O. Whitty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that denied his claim for an occupational disease. We affirm.

Claimant developed symptoms of multiple sclerosis in 1973. He also experienced migraine headaches and right leg numbness. Three years later, he began to work for employer. In 1977, during a leave from work, his symptoms recurred, and he experienced fatigue and blurred vision. In October, 1978, he quit work because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases