COLSON v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND IND.

02-90; CA A65574.

831 P.2d 706 (1992)

113 Or. App. 106

William E. COLSON, dba Sierra Vista Care Center, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES and Ruth Swetland, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Mark M. Loomis, Lee A. Knottnerus, and Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Bureau of Labor and Industries. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

No appearance by respondent Ruth Swetland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) that found that he had committed an unlawful employment practice when he terminated respondent Swetland's employment. ORS 659.410(1). Petitioner argues that BOLI did not have authority to resolve the issue, because he did not receive timely notice of the administrative determination under ORS 659.095(1). We affirm.

BOLI found, in part:

"1) On October 22...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases