UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. v. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY.

No. 315, September Term, 1991.

93 Md. App. 59 (1992)

611 A.2d 993

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ET AL. v. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY, ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

September 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry R. Lord, Baltimore (Cynthia J. Morris and Piper & Marbury, on the brief), for appellants, UPS and Verbal Corp.

H. Russell Smouse (Jack L.B. Gohn, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, H. Emslie Parks, County Atty., and Jack R. Sturgill, Jr., Asst. County Atty., Towson, on the brief), for appellant, Baltimore County, Md.

Peter Max Zimmerman (Phyllis Cole Friedman, on the brief), for appellee, People's Counsel.

J. Carroll Holzer and Holzer, Towson, (Maher, Demilio & Lee, on the brief), for appellee, Hupfer, et al.

Argued before WILNER, C.J., and MOYLAN and CATHELL, JJ.


MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellants are 1) United Parcel Service, Inc.; 2) Verbal Corporation, a United Parcel Service subsidiary; and 3) Baltimore County (hereinafter, collectively, "UPS"). The appellees are People's Counsel for Baltimore County and Paul Hupfer (hereinafter "Mr. Hupfer"). On July 29, 1988, a divided panel of the Baltimore County Board of Appeals rendered a zoning decision in favor of UPS. Mr. Hupfer appealed that ruling to the Circuit Court for Baltimore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases