1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 785 F.Supp.
  5. 785 F.Supp. 719 (1992)
 

ALEXANDER BINZEL CORP. v. NU-TECSYS CORP.

No. 91 C 2092.

785 F.Supp. 719 (1992)

ALEXANDER BINZEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NU-TECSYS CORPORATION and Karl-Heinz Binzel, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 23, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Vittum, Jr., P.C., Gregory J. Smith, Rhett R. Dennerline, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

John S. Mortimer, J. Ray Wood, Wood, Phillips, Mason, Recktenwald & Vansanten, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff; Randall G. Litton, Terence J. Linn, James E. Bartek, Price, Heneveld, Cooper, DeWitt & Litton, Grand Rapids, Mich., of counsel.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Alexander Binzel Corp. ("Binzel") brought this action against defendants Nu-Tecsys Corp. ("Nu-Tecsys") and Karl Heinz Binzel alleging trademark and trade dress infringement. The magistrate judge recommended that Binzel's motion for preliminary injunction be granted in part. After a careful review of the facts and for the reasons set forth herein, Binzel's motion for preliminary injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases