U.S. v. AMERSON

No. 92-0144-CV-W-3.

808 F.Supp. 695 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Thomas A. AMERSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D.

July 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jaye E. Rooney, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Roger P. Hoyt, Stephen H. King, Kansas City, MO, for defendants.

Harold M. Mason, pro se.

Thomas A. Farley, pro se.

James P. Wilson, pro se.


ORDER

ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.

Before this Court is the United States' Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Defendants have failed to file a response to the United States' Motion. Defendant Amerson seeks indemnification or, alternatively, contribution from co-defendants Wilson, Mason, Nash and Farley. Amerson's cross-claim does not allege any jurisdictional basis. Defendant Wilson's cross-claim seeks indemnification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases