1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 841 P.2d
  5. 841 P.2d 660 (1992)
 

STATE v. DEMINGS

P132519; CA A70455.

841 P.2d 660 (1992)

116 Or. App. 394

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Kenneth E. DEMINGS, Jr., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 18, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied January 13, 1993.

Review Denied February 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Uhle, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Thuemmel & Uhle, Portland.

Janie M. Burcart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. His several claims of error relate to the denial of his motion to suppress the results of an Intoxilyzer test. We affirm.

After he was arrested, defendant submitted to an Intoxilyzer test. He moved to suppress the test results on the ground that the officer who conducted the test had not followed the pretest requirement of OAR 257-30-020...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases