1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 970 F.2d
  5. 970 F.2d 529 (1992)
 

U.S. v. SODERLING

Nos. 88-1216, 88-1217, 89-10645, 89-10657, 89-10661, 90-10016, 90-10033, 90-10096, 90-10097, 90-10451, 90-10452, 91-10410, 91-10411 and 89-10658.

970 F.2d 529 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Claimant-Appellee, v. Leif D. SODERLING, Defendant-Appellant. In re Paul B. ANDREW, C.P.M., Receiver. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jay S. SODERLING, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif SODERLING, Defendant-Appellant. (Three Cases) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay S. SODERLING, Defendant-Appellant. (Four Cases) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif D. SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif D. SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif D. SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif SODERLING, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay S. Soderling, in pro. per.

Leif D. Soderling, in pro. per.

Charles B. Burch, Chief Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: FLETCHER, WIGGINS and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Jay and Leif Soderling challenge restitution orders imposed by the district court under the Victim and Witness Protection Act.

Facts

"Seventy-five percent of the failures of FSLIC-insured institutions between 1934 and 1986 occurred after 1979." Note, FIRREA: Controlling Savings and Loan Association Credit Risk Through Capital Standards and Asset Restrictions, 100 Yale L.J. 149...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases