DIXON v. WINDSOR

1901346.

596 So.2d 898 (1992)

Alex DIXON v. H. Jack WINDSOR.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Mark Anderson III, Montgomery, for appellant.

Frank W. Riggs of Riggs & NeSmith, P.A., Montgomery, for appellee.


HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Alex Dixon, appeals the trial court's ruling, based on ore tenus evidence, that a foreclosure by the plaintiff, H. Jack Windsor, was proper and that Dixon had failed to redeem his interest in the property within the one year allowed by statute for redemption.

Dixon and his late wife, Irene Dixon, borrowed $2,000 from George and Lillie Mae Quarles and they executed to the Quarleses a promissory note in that amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases