1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 825 P.2d
  5. 825 P.2d 661 (1992)
 

STATE v. ALT

89M-1965; CA A70390.

825 P.2d 661 (1992)

111 Or.App. 633

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Allen ALT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonel K. Ricker, Enterprise, filed the brief, for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Carol J. Fredrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief, for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and JOSEPH, C.J., and DURHAM, J.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant waived his right to counsel in a probation revocation hearing and represented himself. The record does not show that the trial court advised him of the consequences of a revocation or of the possible consequences and pitfalls of representing himself. See State v. Busby, 107 Or.App. 368, 812 P.2d 14 (1991). A trial court must make at least a minimum inquiry into whether a defendant understands the consequences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases