STATE v. CORDOVA-LOPEZ

91C-20503; CA A71193.

838 P.2d 644 (1992)

115 Or. App. 754

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Raul CORDOVA-LOPEZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. O'Neil, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Catherine Conrad, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant pleaded guilty to 5 charges and was sentenced as a dangerous offender on each conviction. The sentences were imposed under the sentencing guidelines, so appellate review is governed by ORS 138.222.

When a sentencing court imposes an indeterminate dangerous offender sentence in lieu of a determinate sentence under the guidelines, the court is required to state what presumptive sentence would otherwise have been imposed. That presumptive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases