CESSPOOCH v. MAASS

90-C-11170; CA A66857.

825 P.2d 655 (1992)

111 Or.App. 430

Alfredo CESSPOOCH, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Salem, argued the cause, for appellant. With him on the brief was Public Defender's Office, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Reeve v. Maass, 111 Or.App. 213, 825 P.2d 652 (1992) (decided this date); Bartz v. State of Oregon, 110 Or.App. 614, 825 P.2d 657 (1992); Boone v. Wright, 110 Or.App. 281, 822 P.2d 719<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases