BOWEN v. KIL-KARE, INC.

No. 90-2187.

63 Ohio St.3d 84 (1992)

BOWEN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KIL-KARE, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Young, Pryor, Lynn & Jerardi and Michael J. Burdge, for appellants.

Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Becker and Donald L. Anspaugh, for appellees.


DOUGLAS, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the Exhibit A release entitles appellees to summary judgment on Bowen's negligence claim and the loss of consortium claims of Bowen's wife and children. For the reasons that follow, we find that the Exhibit A release does not entitle appellees to summary judgment on these claims.

In the case at bar, the court of appeals found that Bowen, at his deposition, admitted to having signed the Exhibit A and B releases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases