N.L.R.B. v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

Nos. 91-1044, 91-1070 and 91-1087.

952 F.2d 523 (1992)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Labor Relations Board Union 6, Intervenor. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, SACRAMENTO AIR LOGISTICS CENTER, McCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1857, Intervenor. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, UNITED STATES PARK SERVICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, Police Association of the District of Columbia, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 7, 1992.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied March 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc Richman, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, with whom Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Kanter, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in all cases.

Richard Zorn, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, with whom William E. Persina, Solicitor, William R. Tobey, Deputy Sol. and Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent in all cases.

Joseph V. Kaplan, with whom Mark D. Roth, Charles A. Hobbie and Alexia McCaskill, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for intervenors in all cases.

Before EDWARDS, BUCKLEY and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 6, 1992.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated case, three federal agencies petition for review from final orders of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the "FLRA" or "Authority"), which directed the agencies to disclose certain information to the unions that represent agency employees. Under the Federal Service Labor-Management...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases