ATHERTON v. BROOKS

No. 90-CV-1003.

612 A.2d 844 (1992)

Peter James ATHERTON, Appellant, v. Albert BROOKS, Jr., et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter James Atherton, appellant pro se.

Steven M. Schrier, with whom Michael J. McAuliffe, was on the brief, for appellees.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and TERRY and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


TERRY, Associate Judge:

This case arose from a traffic accident in which Brooks' car collided with Atherton's car on an icy street. Because Brooks was not insured, Atherton's insurance carrier was obliged to reimburse Atherton for the damage to his car under an uninsured motorist clause in his policy. Atherton refused, however, to accept his carrier's proffered payment. He then brought an action based on allegations of negligence and breach of contract, naming Brooks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases