1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 826 P.2d
  5. 826 P.2d 623 (1992)
 

STATE v. WOLFS

CC 10-88-01844; CA A60331; SC S37847.

826 P.2d 623 (1992)

312 Or. 646

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner On Review, v. Jay Randall WOLFS, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. Ann Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, filed the petition, for petitioner on review.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the response to the petition, for respondent on review.

GRABER, Justice.

The question presented in this criminal case is whether the granting of a defendant's motion for "judgment of acquittal" during trial, on the sole ground that the indictment did not state facts sufficient to establish a crime, bars a later prosecution. The Court of Appeals answered "yes." State v. Wolfs, 105 Or.App. 5, 803 P.2d 1192 (1990). We reverse.

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases