1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 805 F.Supp.
  5. 805 F.Supp. 642 (1992)
 

OCÉ-OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. 92 C 2221.

805 F.Supp. 642 (1992)

OCÉ-OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC., and Océ-Nederland B.V., Plaintiffs, v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

November 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William O. Bittman, Pierson, Ball & Dowd, Washington, D.C., Jeffrey Singer, Paul E. Wojcicki, Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., Bernard L. Sweeney, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, Falls Church, Va., for plaintiffs.

Thomas F. Gardner, Suzanne S. Greene, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Océ-Office Systems, Inc. and Océ-Nederland B.V. ("Océ"), filed this action against the defendant, Eastman Kodak Co. ("Kodak"), seeking a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs' Océ 2500 Copier-Duplicator (hereinafter "Océ 2500") does not infringe any claim of United States Letters Patent 4,140,387 (hereinafter the '387 patent), which is owned by Kodak, or alternatively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases