1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 4 Cal.App.4th
  5. 4 Cal.App.4th 1443 (1992)
 

MERRILL v. FINBERG

Docket No. D014475.

4 Cal.App.4th 1443 (1992)

6 Cal. Rptr.2d 434

KEN MERRILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TAMAR FINBERG, as Executor, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Shaffman, Iler, Palkowitz & Doft, Arthur M. Palkowitz and Kenneth H. Stone for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Seltzer, Caplan, Wilkins & McMahon, Jennifer L. King and Donald A. English for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.1]

OPINION

FROEHLICH, J.

Appellants Ken Merrill et al. (hereinafter referred to as claimants) appeal from a judgment dismissing their action after the trial court sustained a general demurrer to their first amended complaint without leave to amend. The trial court ruled the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations under Probate Code

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases