CITRON ON BEHALF OF UNITED TECHNOLOGIES v. DANIELL

Nos. 2:91cv00591 (PCD), 2:91cv00689 (PCD).

796 F.Supp. 649 (1992)

Edith CITRON, derivatively on Behalf of UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. Robert F. DANIELL, et al. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. John P. DECKER, derivatively on Behalf of UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. Robert DANIELL, et al. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Daniel Sagarin, Elias A. Alexiades, Hurowitz & Sagarin, Milford, Conn., Daniel J. Bershad, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie Lerach, New York City, for Citron.

Kenneth A. Jacobsen, Francis J. Farina, Greenfield & Chemicles, Haverford, Pa., for Decker.

Thomas J. Groark, Jr., Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Conn., Bernard W. Nussbaum, Laurence B. Pedowtiz, Stephen R. Neuwerth, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City, for defendants.


RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' consolidated shareholder derivative actions, on behalf of United Technologies Corporation ("UT"), a nominal defendant, allege that UT's directors and officers ("defendants") have fraudulently sought to obtain and retain United States defense contracts.1 Plaintiffs claim defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 ("RICO"),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases