1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 830 P.2d
  5. 830 P.2d 603 (1992)
 

AFSCME COUNCIL 75 v. CITY OF SALEM

UP-2-91; CA A71435.

830 P.2d 603 (1992)

113 Or. App. 21

AFSCME COUNCIL 75, Bill McKinley and Hugh Carrier, Respondents, v. CITY OF SALEM, Oregon, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Lee, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was William J. Juza, City Atty., Salem.

Monica A. Smith, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Bennett & Hartman, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and RIGGS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

The City of Salem (City) seeks review of an Employment Relations Board order ruling that City had violated ORS 243.672(1)(g) by refusing to submit a grievance to arbitration and directing City to cease and desist from its refusal. The grievance was filed by AFSCME, the exclusive representative of certain city employees, and asserted that City had violated the collective bargaining agreement by refusing to accord and recognize the permanent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases