1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 650 (1992)
 

CLIFTON v. ASHCROFT

Nos. 91-0254C(6), 91-0322C(6).

780 F.Supp. 650 (1992)

Dewayne CLIFTON, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants. David C. FINLEY, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

January 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dewayne Clifton, pro se.

David Finley, pro se.

R. Henry Branom, Jr., Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants except Finders.

MEMORANDUM

GUNN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs Dewayne Clifton and David C. Finley, prisoners proceeding pro se, assert that completion of the Missouri Sexual Offender Program as a prerequisite to parole violates the ex post facto clause of the constitution.1

Plaintiffs are sexual offenders, one convicted in 1983 and the other in 1989. From 1980 to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases