1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 838 P.2d
  5. 838 P.2d 589 (1992)
 

EDMUNSON v. DEPT. OF INS. AND FINANCE

CA A67544; SC S38858.

838 P.2d 589 (1992)

314 Or. 291

James L. EDMUNSON, Petitioner on Review, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCE, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 24, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied October 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin N. Keaney, of Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review. With him on the response were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a proceeding under ORS 183.4001 to determine the validity of two temporary rules adopted by the Workers' Compensation Division of the Department of Insurance and Finance (the Department). The Court of Appeals held that the challenged rule had been superseded by a later rule, and so declared the proceeding moot and dismissed it. We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases