1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 838 P.2d
  5. 838 P.2d 587 (1992)
 

HOMUTH v. KEISLING

SC S39530.

838 P.2d 587 (1992)

314 Or. 240

Don HOMUTH, Petitioner, v. Phil KEISLING, Secretary of State; Tony Meeker, State Treasurer; Fred D. Miller, Director of Executive Department; and Richard A. Munn, Director of Department of Revenue, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Hinkle, Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland, filed the petition and argued the cause, for petitioner.

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents. On the answering memorandum were Robert B. Rocklin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles S.

Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before CARSON, C.J., and PETERSON, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner brings an original proceeding in this court pursuant to ORS 250.131,1 seeking review of the Estimate of Financial Impact for 1992 Ballot Measure 4, to be included in the Voters' Pamphlet and on the ballot for the next general election. If passed, Ballot Measure 4 would prohibit the operation of so-called "triples" in Oregon. The Oregon Department of Transportation defines a "triple" as a truck pulling two trailers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases