SODERQUIST v. KRAMER

No. 23342-CA.

595 So.2d 825 (1992)

Bob H. SODERQUIST, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael E. KRAMER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

February 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kidd & Culpepper by Paul Henry Kidd, Monroe, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh by David H. Nelson, Monroe, for defendants-appellees.

Before LINDSAY, BROWN and STEWART, JJ.


STEWART, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Bob and Margaret Soderquist, appeal summary judgment which was entered against them and in favor of defendants, Michael E. Kramer and Home Insurance Company. The issue before us is whether a summary judgment may be granted to an attorney defendant in a legal malpractice case where the basis of the motion for summary judgment rests entirely on a settlement agreement (1) which the attorney was not a party to, (2) which he advised his client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases