1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 13 Cal.App.4th
  5. 13 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1992)
 

PEOPLE v. GOULET

Docket No. 3227.

13 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1992)

17 Cal. Rptr.2d 801

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUDITH ANN GOULET, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Ventura.

December 18, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Judith Ann Goulet, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Michael Bradbury, District Attorney, Kent Baker and William Redmond, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

OSBORNE, P.J. —

A. INTRODUCTION

Several cases have clearly explained the speed trap laws adopted by the California Legislature, the policies behind them, the burden placed on the prosecution, and the general statutory requirements for an engineering and traffic survey to justify a speed zone reduced below 55 miles per hour. In this case, we apply those requirements and determine that a survey did not justify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases