IN RE MICHAEL M.

(10577)

29 Conn. App. 112 (1992)

IN RE MICHAEL M. ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released September 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Rozwaski, for the appellant (respondent).

Mary-Anne Ziewacz Mulholland, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

FOTI, LANDAU and FREEDMAN, JS.


LANDAU, J.

This is an appeal by the respondent, Gwendolyn M., from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her children, Michael and Mamie M., pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 17-43a (b) (1), (2) and (4) (now § 17a-112).1 The trial court found that the allegations in the petitions for termination had been proven by clear and convincing evidence and that it was in the best interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases