1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 980 F.2d
  5. 980 F.2d 432 (1992)
 

WRIGHT-MOORE CORP. v. RICOH CORP.

Nos. 92-1060 and 92-1140.

980 F.2d 432 (1992)

WRIGHT-MOORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. RICOH CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 10, 1992.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 10, 1992.

As Amended December 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip A. Whistler (argued), Cory Brundage, Fred R. Biesecker, Ice, Miller, Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, Ind., Vincent J. Backs, Beers, Mallers, Backs, Salin & Larmore, Fort Wayne, Ind., for Wright-Moore Corp.

James P. Fenton (argued), Robert S. Walters, Barrett & McNagny, Fort Wayne, Ind., for Ricoh Corp.

Before CUMMINGS and MANION, Circuit Judges, and ZAGEL, District Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 10, 1992.

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In January 1986, Wright-Moore Corporation filed an eight-count complaint against Ricoh Corporation because it refused to renew its national distributorship agreement with Wright-Moore after the expiration of its one-year term. On motion for summary judgment, Judge Lee held that Ricoh had good cause not to renew the distributorship agreement and that Ricoh did so in good faith...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases