CHARRON v. STATE

No. 61251.

835 S.W.2d 575 (1992)

Kenneth CHARRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

September 8, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joseph P. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The denial of Movant's Rule 29.15 motion is affirmed. Movant has previously filed a Rule 27.26 motion. And, a Rule 29.15 motion may not be used to present newly discovered evidence.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Affirmed under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases