1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 834 P.2d
  5. 834 P.2d 552 (1992)
 

SHOOK v. VONDER HAAR

90-2029; CA A69474.

834 P.2d 552 (1992)

114 Or. App. 638

Joyce A. SHOOK, Respondent, v. Michael VONDER HAAR, Appellant, and Jane Doe Vonder Haar, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale Crandall, Salem, argued the cause and filed the reply brief for appellant. On the opening brief were Stephen F. Cook, Richard G. Matson, Lisa E. Lear and Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Marilyn M. Wall, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Wall & Wall, P.C., Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. Kintigh v. Elliott, 280 Or. 265, 570 P.2d 659<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases