1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 9 Cal.App.4th
  5. 9 Cal.App.4th 1362 (1992)
 

STOLL v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A055344.

9 Cal.App.4th 1362 (1992)

12 Cal. Rptr.2d 354

GERHARD STOLL, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; S-K-I, LTD., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

September 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Long & Levit, Ronald E. Mallen, Barry D. Brown and Barbara W. Engler for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Berger & Norton, Jacqueline A. Axtell and Michael M. Berger for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

KING, J.

In this case, we hold that the statute of limitations within which a client must commence an action against an attorney on a claim for legal malpractice or breach of a fiduciary duty is identical. Unless tolled, a claim based on either theory falls within the statutory term "wrongful act or omission" and must be commenced within one year after the client discovers,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases