1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 481 N.W.2d
  5. 481 N.W.2d 884 (1992)
 

AUSTIN v. AUSTIN

No. C2-91-1551.

481 N.W.2d 884 (1992)

In re the Marriage of Fred L. AUSTIN, Petitioner/Obligor, Appellant, v. Mabel F. AUSTIN, Obligee, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel R. Butler, Daniel R. Butler & Assoc., P.A., St. Paul, for appellant.

Tom Foley, Ramsey County Atty., Ronelle Anderson, Asst. County Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and HUSPENI and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Fred L. Austin argues that this action should have been brought in the name of the Ramsey County Welfare Department, because the County, rather than respondent Mabel F. Austin, is the real party in interest. He further argues that the family court has no jurisdiction to modify the child support order. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

This case involves the obligation to pay support for B.A., who was born October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases