1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 974 F.2d
  5. 974 F.2d 387 (1992)
 

WALTZ v. COUNTY OF LYCOMING

No. 91-5090.

974 F.2d 387 (1992)

Richard A. WALTZ, v. COUNTY OF LYCOMING, Raymond A. Holland, and Peter J. Purcaro, Richard A. Waltz, Allen E. Ertel, Attorney, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 4, 1992.

Order on Denial of Rehearing September 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. David Smith, McCormick, Reeder, Nichols, Sarno, Bahl & Knecht, Williamsport, Pa., for County of Lycoming, appellee.

A. Taylor Williams, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Administrative Office of Pa. Courts, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raymond A. Holland and Peter J. Purcaro, appellees.

John C. Youngman, Jr., Candor, Youngman, Gibson & Gault, Williamsport, Pa., for Allen E. Ertel, Attorney appellant.

Allen E. Ertel, Williamsport, Pa., for Richard A. Waltz, appellant.

Before: BECKER and HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judges, FULLAM, Senior District Judge.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) September 19, 1991.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FULLAM, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant and his attorney appeal from an Order of the District Court imposing Rule 11 sanctions.1 We apply an abuse-of-discretion standard in reviewing all aspects of the District Court's determinations. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corporation, 496 U.S. 384

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases