1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 5 Cal.App.4th
  5. 5 Cal.App.4th Supp. 8 (1992)
 

LOESCH v. BARTHOLOMEW

Docket No. 4580.

5 Cal.App.4th Supp. 8 (1992)

8 Cal. Rptr.2d 27

JAMES LOESCH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NINA BARTHOLOMEW, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Francisco.

March 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael Norton for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Nina Bartholomew in pro. per. for Defendant and Appellant.

OPINION

CAHILL, J.

The above entitled matter having been argued and submitted, this court reverses the judgment of the trial court. The appellate department finds that the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion for nonsuit and granting judgment to respondent where the cause of action was based on a void transaction pursuant to California Business and Professions Code sections 6870 and 6852.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases