REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. INT'L HOUSE OF PANCAKES

Docket No. A055648.

9 Cal.App.4th 1343 (1992)

12 Cal. Rptr.2d 358

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CONCORD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Erickson, Beasley, Hewitt & Wilson, John H. Erickson and Alice M. Beasley for Defendant and Appellant.

Latham & Watkins, Jerrold A. Fadem, George Kimball and Marcia Bobb as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Goldfarb & Lipman, Lee C. Rosenthal, Peter Franklin and Michael Berry for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

STRANKMAN, P.J.

Section 1263.510 of the state's Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc., § 1230.010 et seq.) provides that upon proof of certain facts, the "owner of a business conducted on the property taken" shall be compensated for loss of goodwill caused by the taking.1 The narrow question in this case is whether a franchisor who granted a franchise for

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases