PAWLENDZIO v. SENCO PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 92-254.

610 So.2d 734 (1992)

Frank PAWLENDZIO, Appellant, v. SENCO PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 31, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Paul Katz of Chiumento & Katz, P.A., Palm Coast, for appellant.

Thomas M. Burke and John A. Boudet of Cabaniss, Burke & Wagner, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

PETERSON, J., dissents with opinion.

PETERSON, Judge, dissenting.

I would vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial because of an evidentiary error. Senco Products, Inc. (Senco) was allowed to admit as evidence a signed statement given by Pawlendzio to an investigator for the employer's worker's compensation carrier. The statement was given several weeks after Pawlendzio discharged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases