ESTATE OF BLETTELL v. SNIDER

89 CV 60; CA A68426.

834 P.2d 505 (1992)

114 Or. App. 162

ESTATE OF Mary M. BLETTELL, Herman Blettell, Personal Representative and Herman Blettell, Appellants, v. Darlene SNIDER and Harry C. Snider, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 8, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied September 30, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Storie, Bend, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Gray, Fancher, Holmes, Hurley, Bryant & Lovlien, Bend.

Brant Medonich, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Kottkamp & O'Rourke, Pendleton.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for a declaratory judgment that a deed conveying property to defendant Darlene Snider was void, because it was not delivered. They appeal a judgment for defendants. We affirm.1

Because the nature of this action is essentially an equitable proceeding to quiet title to real property, we review de novo. ORS 19.125(3); see Neuschafer v. McHale, 76 Or.App...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases