1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 962 F.2d
  5. 962 F.2d 372 (1992)
 

HINKLEMAN v. SHELL OIL CO.

No. 91-2328.

962 F.2d 372 (1992)

Francis George HINKLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided May 6, 1992.

As Amended July 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Carl Storm, Abrams, West & Storm, P.C., Bethesda, Md., argued, for plaintiff-appellant.

M. Albert Figinski, Weinberg & Green, Baltimore, Md., argued (Carol Saffran-Brinks, Weinberg & Green, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and WARD, Senior United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Francis Hinkleman, a service station operator, appeals the district court's disposition under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 56 of his franchise claims against Shell Oil Company. Hinkleman had filed a two-count complaint with the district court alleging: 1) that Shell Oil Company's termination of his petroleum marketing franchise agreement violated section 102(b)(2)(C) of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases