1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 834 P.2d
  5. 834 P.2d 496 (1992)
 

STATE v. QUINTERO

88C22022, 88C22023, 88C22024; CA A60589 (Control), CA A60839, CA A61030.

834 P.2d 496 (1992)

114 Or. App. 142

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Antonio QUINTERO, Sr., Appellant, STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Hipolito VILLARREAL, Appellant, STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Miguel QUINTERO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In banc.

July 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin T. Lafky, Lafky & Lafky, Salem, for petition.

DEITS, Judge.

Defendant has petitioned for review of our decision. 110 Or.App. 247, 823 P.2d 981 (1991). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it for clarification.

Defendant contends that we erred in holding:

"On appeal, [defendant] also asserts as a basis for his motion to sever the prejudice allegedly caused to him by the testimony of Lila ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases