PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of his conviction, after jury trial, of two counts of armed robbery with a deadly weapon. He raises three issues: (1) whether a mistrial should have been declared based upon the state's alleged racial use of peremptory challenges; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to sustain convictions for armed robbery with a deadly weapon, and (3) whether appellant could be sentenced as an habitual violent felony offender...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
